![]() ![]() If redistribution is a concern I think most of serious companies would be fine with having a “watermarked” version, non-redistribute clauses etc. This could save a lot of headache in situations where the process is clear and on the surface looks like a simple automation project, but becomes a pain as the application is just one big blob (or has UI structure straight from hell) and you need to build layers of workarounds to do basic stuff. ![]() We could then just have it on a USB/Google Drive/Sharepoint/wherever and check how the robot will see the application straight up during assessment workshop (or equivalent). With above in mind - would it be possible to extract UiExplorer as a no-installation. Obviously, best case scenario is to check with full Studio and do a PoC, but that’s not always feasible. On the other hand, it might be difficult to properly assess workload for a project without knowing how the interaction will look like from robot perspective. involve IT) without knowing first that they will for sure get the benefit. As we all know it’s sometimes hard to convince customers to make a commitment (f.e. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |